Re: Trump Sending 10,000 more troops to Iran
chuck
10/05/2026 05:01 PM
You fixate on his personality and not on his accomplishments despite the attacks on him. Go ahead and fight his efforts to improve the country while you watch your freedoms diminish and your daughter afraid not to wear a hijab.
13
792
Read More
|
|
Re: Trump Sending 10,000 more troops to Iran
chuck
10/04/2026 05:24 PM
Trump isn't going to release the Epstein files because it will show he's a violent pedophile. The world is on it way to a new dark age and you worry about partisan unfounded speculation about the character of the man who is our best hope to save us. Your generation's focus is dooming western civilization and your daughter is going to pay the price. As to Epstein---from Grok: Many Epstein-related files have been released—millions of pages, plus videos and images—under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (signed into law in November 2025), but not everything, and the process has been incomplete, delayed, heavily redacted, and contested. The Act required the Department of Justice to publicly release unclassified records, files, communications, and investigative materials related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in a searchable format, with a December 19, 2025 deadline. Exceptions allowed withholding or redacting for victim privacy/personally identifiable information, child sexual abuse material or images of abuse, classified material tied to national defense/foreign policy, or information that would jeopardize an active federal investigation/prosecution (narrowly and temporarily). The law explicitly barred withholding for embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity. What happened in practice
Initial releases around the deadline were partial (tens of thousands of pages). DOJ later released roughly 3–3.5 million pages (plus ~2,000 videos and ~180,000 images) by late January 2026, describing this as compliance. It has stated that unreleased material (estimates varied around additional millions of pages from a total review pool of ~6 million) consisted of duplicates, unrelated items, or material protected by privilege or the Act’s exceptions. Review involved hundreds of staff due to volume; DOJ cited logistical issues, de-duplication, and careful redaction to protect victims (sometimes over-redacting or making errors that exposed identifying details, leading to temporary withdrawals of material). Grand jury materials generally require court authorization and have faced judicial resistance or limits. Other gaps reported include certain older emails/attachments, some surveillance footage, specific investigative records from other agencies, and items claimed as privileged or outside the Act’s scope (which primarily covers DOJ holdings). As of mid-to-late 2026, questions and litigation continued over redactions (some challenged as exceeding the Act’s limits), missing or incomplete records (e.g., certain FBI interview summaries), and whether full compliance occurred. Judges have ordered justifications or further production in some cases; lawmakers, survivors, and others have criticized delays, selectivity, and opacity. DOJ has maintained it released what the law required while protecting victims and legal constraints.
Core reasons not everything is public
Victim protection and privacy law: Primary, ongoing justification. Materials identifying victims (or potential ones), depicting abuse, or containing sensitive personal data are redacted or withheld. Errors in this process have occurred and been corrected. Legal privileges and process limits: Grand jury secrecy, attorney work product, certain privileges, court seals on specific filings, and the need for judicial approval in some instances. Volume and logistics: Millions of pages/data required extensive review, redaction, and technical handling; DOJ described this as the main practical bottleneck. Statutory exceptions and scope: Active investigations (if any), classified info, duplicates/unrelated material, and limits on what other agencies must produce. Ongoing disputes: Accusations of over-redaction or selective withholding (from critics across parties) versus claims of careful compliance (from DOJ). No “client list” of the type popularly imagined has been confirmed to exist in the released materials; much content is correspondence, logs, photos, investigative records, etc., that do not automatically equal prosecutable evidence against third parties.
Releases have been incremental and imperfect rather than a single complete dump. Earlier civil-case unsealings (e.g., related to Giuffre v. Maxwell) and congressional productions also contributed over time, but the 2025 Act drove the largest DOJ tranche. Political pressure, FOIA suits, and oversight continue to push for more transparency or clarification of withholdings. Exact remaining volume and future releases depend on ongoing reviews, court rulings, and any further legislation or enforcement efforts.
13
792
Read More
|
|
Re: Trump Sending 10,000 more troops to Iran
Fahrenheit451
10/04/2026 04:35 AM
Trump wants to take as many people to Hell with him as he can. You are absolutely following this man there.
That is a fact.
Btw,
Trump isn't going to release the Epstein files because it will show he's a violent pedophile.
Now, if you have any other reason why he won't release the files, feel free to share them. Nobody innocent hides evidence that would exonerate them.
13
792
Read More
|
|
Re: Trump Sending 10,000 more troops to Iran
chuck
10/04/2026 03:51 AM
12 years of this CONVICTED Con Man rapist is all I can take. If you were half the lawyer you say you are you would know how hollow those convictions are. The fact that you use them as a talking point shows how unsubstantial your statements are.
13
792
Read More
|
|
Re: Trump Sending 10,000 more troops to Iran
Fahrenheit451
10/03/2026 10:21 PM
It's unbelievable that you believe this con man..
$5000 checks ONLY if Republicans win both houses?
Don't they already have both houses? How do you explain this?
I am waiting to hear your explanation.
While you are at it, please explain how this is not a bribe...
12 years of this CONVICTED Con Man rapist is all I can take.
13
792
Read More
|
|
Re: Trump Sending 10,000 more troops to Iran
chuck
10/03/2026 08:23 PM
Trumps real "base" now is the Baby boomers. Trying to give the next generation the quality of life we enjoyed. Young people dont want anything to do with Trump anymore. You justify your stance by citing the opinion of the immature and gullible.
13
792
Read More
|
|
Re: Trump Sending 10,000 more troops to Iran
chuck
10/03/2026 04:30 PM
You are without a doubt becoming one of the dumbest people I have ever chatted with... Trump has lost more than half of his supporters. And you are still sticking with him. Wow. You rely on other people's opinion to support position and you call me dumb. Look around you and see how the world is descending into third world chaos. Trump is our best bet to avoid that. You've been indoctrinated from the liberal educational system and that indoctrination has been re enforced by the MSM. The majority of your pots are personal attacks using cartoons and clips of idiots. Try addressing the items I've listed before: border control, election security, US and world safety, DEI, abortion, massive fraud, etc. etc. etc. ...you live in California.. You'll be happy to know we're moving to Mississippi within the year. Here is another clip for you. I rest my case. Get real.
13
792
Read More
|
|
|
|